Original Message:
Re: Vacation Village in Berkshires Hancock Massachusetts (by KC):
With all due respect, I really have to wonder why the 80 years old Canadian widow referenced above doesn't just politely tell VV in Massachusetts to GO POUND SAND?
After all, there is absolutely nothing that VV can possibly do if an elderly Canadian citizen decided to just walk away from that timeshare. VV would ultimately foreclose on the timeshare ownership of course --- but so what? It's not as though there is any imaginable scenario in which the elderly Canadian widow could or would ever receive anything back from VV, so why even bother dealing with them any further at all if they are being so difficult? Why not instead just bid VV a quiet and permanent farewell, never communicating with them again and never sending them another penny? Why spend stressful time and effort merely being sent around in circles, apparently to no productive end? At her advanced age and in her personal situation, she surely does not need this particular headache in her life and it would certainly seem that the VV personnel are being both insensitive and obstructive.
If in that widow's shoes, I would just simply wave GOODBYE to VV and be DONE with them forever. If they won't willingly accept a deedback, then VV can instead undertake the otherwise unnecessary time, effort and expense to initiate foreclosure. VV would get the ownership back much more quickly and easily by merely accepting a quit claim deed from the widow, but if VV chooses instead to do things the harder, more expensive way, then by all means let them go right ahead and do so.